Evaluating audio quality from the latest field test can be tricky business. At time higher sample rates can be an asset at other times a detriment. Around 1983 digital audio formats entered the consumer format with the 16-bit/44.1kHZ standard. While some purists still claim analog is more enjoyable, advances in technology give today’s laptops higher recording precision that those early converters. With this better equipment some designers are doubling the kHZ of the sample, but it is yet to be proven whether the product is better.
Read the full article here:
Are higher sampling rates always better? Justin Colletti tells us when.
There may be apps that do that. You can definitely find spectrum analyzers that will measure ultra low.
Is there an APP that can measure the ultra low frequency levels?
.Plaster is a viable middle and high frequency absorber. We have used it many times in new builds that have…
Hi Dennis I'm curious what you think of acoustic perforated plaster - say CST Galaxy -on particularly ceilings in music…